Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot: Choosing the Right Framework for Your Project

In the Java ecosystem, two main frameworks stand out for enterprise application development: Jakarta EE (formerly Java EE) and Spring Boot. While both options aim to simplify enterprise Java development, they take distinctly different approaches. This comprehensive comparison will help you make an informed decision on which framework is best suited to support your next project.

Core Philosophy and Design Approach

Key Differences

Development Speed and Setup

Spring Boot emphasizes rapid development with its Spring Initializr, pre-configured embedded servers and extensive auto-configuration capabilities. Everything you need comes bundled in a standalone application, making it quick to get started and deploy.

Jakarta EE takes a more traditional approach, requiring explicit configuration and separate runtime setup. While this means more initial setup time, it provides greater control and clarity over your application’s infrastructure.

Flexibility and Control

Both Java frameworks offer flexibility, but in different ways:

Jakarta EE offers:

• Standardized approaches to common problems
• Clear boundaries between components
• Vendor-neutral specifications
• Consistent behavior across implementations (mostly)

Spring Boot provides:

• Easy integration with third-party libraries
• Mix-and-match components as needed
• Extensive configuration options
• Rich ecosystem of Spring projects

Enterprise Features

When to Choose Each Framework

Choose Jakarta EE When:

• You need standardization across a large organization
• Long-term stability is a priority
• You want to avoid vendor lock-in
• Your team has experience with traditional Java EE
• You’re working in a highly regulated environment
• You need guaranteed backward compatibility

Choose Spring Boot When:

• Rapid development is a priority
• You’re building microservices
• You want modern development practices out of the box
• Your team prefers convention over configuration
• You need extensive third-party integrations
• You’re building cloud-native applications

Performance Considerations

Both Java frameworks can deliver excellent performance when properly configured. The key differences lie in their operational characteristics:

Jakarta EE provides:

• Better runtime performance for large applications
• Optimization for long-running processes
• Strong support for heavy enterprise workloads
• Efficient resource utilization in full application servers

Spring Boot typically offers:

• Faster startup times
• Smaller memory footprint
• Excellence in microservices
• Optimization for cloud deployments

Code Example Comparison

Here’s a simple REST endpoint in both frameworks:

Jakarta EE:

@Path("/greeting")
@RequestScoped
public class GreetingResource {

    @GET
    @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
    public Response getGreeting() {
        return Response.ok(new Greeting("Hello, Jakarta EE!")).build();
    }
}

Spring Boot:

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/greeting")
public class GreetingController {

    @GetMapping
    public Greeting getGreeting() {
        return new Greeting("Hello, Spring Boot!");
    }
}

Learning Curve

Jakarta EE has a steeper initial learning curve but offers a more structured learning path. Its standardized approach means that once you understand the core concepts, they apply consistently across different implementations.

Spring Boot generally offers an easier entry point for modern Java developers, with extensive documentation and community resources. However, mastering the entire Spring ecosystem can take considerable time due to its vast scope and frequent updates.

Future Outlook

Both frameworks are actively evolving to meet modern development needs:

Jakarta EE is:

• Moving towards cloud-native features
• Continuing standardization efforts
• Focusing on modernization while maintaining stability
• Growing its adoption in the cloud-native space

Spring Boot is:

• Leading innovation in cloud-native development
• Continuing to focus on developer productivity
• Strengthening integration with modern tools and practices
• Expanding its microservices capabilities
• Navigating organisational changes as Broadcom acquired VMware (and thus Spring), though development and community support remain active

The Spring ecosystem’s transition to Broadcom ownership has sparked discussions in the community, but the framework’s open-source nature and strong community foundation continue to drive its evolution and adoption.

Conclusions

The choice between Jakarta EE and Spring Boot often comes down to specific project requirements and organizational needs. Jakarta EE shines in traditional enterprise environments where standardization and stability are paramount, while Spring Boot excels in rapid development and modern application scenarios.

Consider your team’s expertise, project requirements and long-term maintenance needs when making your decision. Both frameworks are excellent choices when used in their sweet spots, and understanding these differences will help you make the right choice for your specific situation.

Remember that it’s also possible to mix both frameworks in larger organizations, using each where it makes the most sense. The key is to align your choice with your specific use case rather than following general trends.